Re: Ban the person above you [Game]

by Guest Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:40 pm

Banned for approving of my confused state of being? =P

by **The Trainmaster** Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:46 pm

Banned for double speak.

by Guest Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:47 pm

Banned because I don't know what you just said?

by **The Trainmaster** Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:51 pm

Banned for lack of understanding. xD

by Guest Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:55 pm

BANNED FOR USING BOLD.
And making me feel dumber than dirt. xD

by **The Trainmaster** Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:10 pm

Not banned because I am deeply sorry for this atrocity. xD

by **hockeyfanatic** Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:22 pm

Banned again for making Jackie feel dumb.

by Guest Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:22 pm

Banned for having useless siblings! =P

by **The Trainmaster** Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:27 pm

Not banned for your signature. xD

by Guest Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:37 am

Not banned for listening to me rant. Thanks for that. <3

by **The Trainmaster** Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:34 pm

Banned for trying to kiss up so I would say "Not Banned" for some reason I would make up. xD

by Guest Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:04 pm

Banned for having no sympathy. xD

by **hockeyfanatic** Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:52 pm

Not-banned for banning Cody. xD

by **The Trainmaster** Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:18 pm

Banned for playing favorites. xD

by **hockeyfanatic** Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:50 pm

Banned because the Phillies had a pretty decent trade deadline, as did the Pirates.

by **The Trainmaster** Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:09 pm

Phillies? Decent? Banned for smoking the crazy pipe. xD

by **hockeyfanatic** Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:57 pm

Banned for failing to appreciate Ruben Amaro.

Happ/Gose/Villar is chump change for Oswalt (his uninspiring Phillies debut notwithstanding). Happ is not anywhere near as good as he pitched last year - he had a 4.49 xFIP last year, with alarming flyball and strikeout rates. Lucky.

Not to mention, Amaro didn't force a Werth trade when there didn't need to be one.

by **The Trainmaster** Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:13 pm

I'll give you the two kids, but Happ did have some talent. And I would have much rather tried to offer Joltin' Joe Blanton or Kendrick before I'd give up Happ.

And still, I'd much rather have someone of Pat Gillick's caliber than Amaro.

Banned for making me think long enough to write that. xD

by **hockeyfanatic** Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:35 pm

Banned because you don't seem to understand how good of a trade that was.

Happ is only slightly better than Blanton or Kendrick. His numbers on the surface, however, are much better - so he is valued higher by GMs, even though his true value is roughly equal to Kendrick and only somewhat better than Blanton. If you would have shopped Kendrick, you would have gotten little interest. Trading Blanton would be nigh impossible.

And anyway, your goal is to build a playoff rotation, right? Halladay-Hamels-Oswalt is a great playoff rotation, and Kendrick's not a bad guy to start if you absolutely have to use a fourth starter.

Also, Oswalt has years of control after this one, so he's not just a rental.

by **The Trainmaster** Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:31 pm

Banned for letting this thread die.

by Kiera Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:25 am

Banned for reviving this thread

by **The Trainmaster** Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:45 am

Banned for hatin' on my reviving skills.

by Kiera Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:47 am

Banned for lying im not hatin' i just can't go 'not-banned' dude. its a banning game not a 'not-banned' xD

by **The Trainmaster** Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:20 am

Not-banned because she got the premise right. xD

by Kiera Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:28 am

Banned for breaking the banning rule dude like i said! Its not a NON BANNED THING! XD

by Sponsored content